• Organizational Decision Making



    Organizations are composed of managers who make decisions using both rational and intuitive processes; but organization level decisions are not usually made by a single manager. Many organizational decisions involve several managers. Problem identification and problem solution involve many departments, multiple viewpoints, and even other organizations, which are beyond the scope of an individual manager. Research into organization level decision making has identified four types of organizational decision making processes; the management science approach, the Carnegie model, the incremental decision process model, and the garbage can model.


    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE APPROACH
    The management science approach to organizational decision making is the analog to the rational approach by individual managers. Management science came into being during World War II. At that time, mathematical and statistical techniques were applied to urgent, large scale military problems taht were beyond the ability of individual decision makers. Mathematicians, physicists, and operations researchers used system analysis to develop artillery trajectories, antisubmarine strategies, and bombing strategies such as salvoing (discharging multiple shells simultaneously). Consider the problem of a battleship trying to sink an enemy ship several miles away. The calculation for aiming the battleship’s guns should consider distence, wind speed, shell size, speed and direction of both ships, pitch and roll of the firing ship, and curvature of the earth. Methods for performing such calculations using trial and error and intuition are not accurate, take far too long, and may never achieve  success.
    This is where management science came in. Analysts were able to identify the relevant variables involved in aiming a ship’s guns and could model them with the use of mathematical equations. Distance, speed, pitch, roll, shell size, and so on could be calculated and entered into the equations. The answer was immediate and the guns could begin firing. Factors such as pitch and roll were soon measured mechanically and fed directly into the targeting mechanism. Today, the human element is completely removed from the targeting processes. Radar picks up the target and the entire sequence is computed automatically.
    Management science yealded astonishing success for many military problems. This approach to decision making diffused into corporations and business schools where techniques were studied and elaborated. Today, many corporations have assigned departments to use these techniques. The computer department develops quantitative data for analysis. Operations research departments use mathematical models to quantify relevant variables and develop a quantitative representation of alternative solutions and the probability of each one solving the problem. These departments also use devices such as linear programming, Bayesian statistics, PERT charts, and computer simulations.
    Management science is an excellent device for organizational decision making when problems are analyzable and when the variables can be identified and measured. Mathematical models can contain a thousand or more variables, each one relevant in some way to the ultimate outcome. Management science techniques have been used to correctly solve problems as diverse as finding the right spot for a church camp, test marketing the first of a new family of products, drilling for oil, and radically altering the distribution of telecommucations services. Other problems amenable to management science techniques are the efficient scheduling of air crews for commercial flights and the training of crews, as illustrated  in the following case.
    Management science can accurately and quickly solve problems that have too many explicit variables for human processing. This system is at its best when applied to problems that are analyzable, and can be structured in a logical way.
    Management science has also produced many failures. Part of the reason, as discussed in the preceding chapter, is that quantitative data are not rich. Informal cues that indicate the existence of problems have to be sensed on a more personal basis by managers. The most sophisticated mathematical analyses are of no value if the important factors cannot be quantified and included in the model, such as happened when Quaker Oats decided to acquire Gaines. Such things as competitor reactions, consumer “tastes”, and product “warmth” are qualitative dimensions. In these situations, the role of management science is to supplement manager decision making. Quantitative results can be given to managers for discussion and interpretation along with their informal opinions, judgment, and intuition. The final decision can include qualitative factors as well as quantitative calculations.